Loading ...

Blue sky thinking needed to re-imagine and rebuild the economy

First Published in News24 on   May 10th, 2020   |   by   Isaah Mhlanga

Blue sky thinking needed to re-imagine and rebuild the economy
iStock

First published in News24 on May 10, 2020


Never before have we seen a synchronized and sudden halt to normal life and economic activity than we have seen since the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus a global pandemic. The pace of economic reorganization is phenomenal and the global economy of the future will likely settle at a new normal that is very different from a pre-COVID-19 one.


For South Africa, the pandemic has done two things. First, it glaringly exposed fault lines that have always existed in the social, spatial and economic organizational structure. Second, it has added new challenges that complicate how the faulty lines from the past should be addressed. A total rethink of what South Africa should look like and the necessary commitment to make it happen is more than ever, required; and nothing should be off-limits in creating a sustainable and inclusive economy for the future.


The incoming data are instructive in getting a sense of what will remain when COVID-19 has passed, whenever that will be. I see three crucial realities that we will have to contend with. 


First, we are more likely to reside in a country that has a higher unemployment rate than what we currently have. The National Treasury estimates that three million people will likely lose their jobs in a more optimistic scenario and up to seven million jobs in a worse scenario.  That is roughly 20% and 43% of the sixteen million-odd people formally employed, respectively. A profoundly troubling picture.


Secondly, we will be left with an economy in a deep recession. Current estimates are wide-ranging from -6% to -16% for 2020. The economy will be smaller by a minimum of R180bn and R480bn at worst in real terms.


Third, inequality and poverty would have worsened significantly, with those that have always been on the fringes of the economy completely depended on the state for survival, which has other consequences for the fiscus (but the latter is for another day).


The current debates have concentrated on the diagnosis of the immediate problems due to COVID-19 and what needs to be done post-COVID-19. These debates are missing one crucial element, which is; what kind of economy and society do we need to create after the pandemic? An answer to this question will then inform policymakers what needs to be done.


I view the South Africa I hope for in the following way. I will not buy a good house in a bad neighbourhood for my overall experience of life will be dictated by the broader environment than narrow and gated comfort. Let me elaborate on my thinking.  


Any idea that proposes a future economic and social structure must do three sets of objectives that translate across economic factors, spatial organization and the governance structures across the public and private sectors.


On the economic front, the objective must be to reduce the triple challenges of high unemployment, inequality and poverty. Everybody that can and want to work my find employment so that they can self-determine the course of their livelihood. A core focus of improving economic outcomes must be a focus on productivity and innovation because without them the distributional aspects will not yields desired results.


The spatial organization of human settlements that we inherited from the apartheid regime and made minimal effort to reverse reinforces the economic divides that currently exists. Any future that does not address such divide will fail to create a new and sustainable society. Create human settlements that make distance irrelevant in everyday life both in terms of costs and time spend.  The idea of gated communities closes to places of work for the few while the majority are packed many kilometers away from centres of economic activity is neither desirable nor sustainable. It is in fact, detrimental for social cohesion and must be changed.


The other aspects that need to be looked at are the relationship between government, business and civil society and the governance structures that exists between and within each of these groupings. Big business ought to realize that it exists in society and its survival and prosperity is linked to that of society. As such, the way it operates must not be merely to extract resources out of society but to build a sustainable society from which future opportunities will come from.


Government and civil society also need to be bold and be able to reverse the bad or outdated policies that no longer fulfils what they were designed to achieve. More so, the government must not be afraid to implement policies that are to the benefit of the economy, and equally so, should not treat the business as an enemy but a partner who can drive social and economic progress with the right incentive structure.


What are some of the elements that are required to create such a society? I think about the following three necessaries but not sufficient conditions to propel economic growth from its snail’s pace of the past few years. First, regaining fiscal credibility to make sure that the monies spend yield visible social change. Second, big-bang structural economic reforms must be done, and lastly a focus on productivity improvements in everything the country embarks on.


For these three aspects to be realised there has to be consensus in the governing party, the government, business, trade unions and civil society on priority areas and what the structure of the economy should look like, the elements of which I outlined above.


To be successful, we need to avoid what the veteran investment economist Mohammed El Erian calls active inertia, which means that despite knowing what is wrong and the solutions already are known, there is a tendency to pivot on the same actions that created the current economic malaise. Perhaps this is a reflection of political paralysis in the country, which is created by a divergence of interest across society. I point this out knowing well that the right political setup, as an economist, I am unqualified to comment on, but the current political dynamics paralyses much of the efforts to reforms.


We need to eliminate the paralysis that creates a bimodal economic policy distribution, whereby it is possible to get both bad and good economic policy outcomes from the same government that has committed itself to economic reforms. This is only possible if the best minds in the country are charged with leading efforts to create a better country.  What’s more, accountability needs to be better implemented in such a way that those that are tasked with leading society will be held at the highest standard possible, failing of which, they need to voluntarily recuse themselves from leadership roles.


As far as the economic reforms are concerned, National Treasury, with inputs from many economists, local and global, have proposed a set of microeconomic reforms that will increase the productive capacity of the economy, reduce the cost structure and enhance competition. Those set of reforms offers a good place to start and the evidence exists to show that implementation is slowly taking place. Though devastating, this pandemic may just have been the catalyst that the government never needed to finally push through these reforms.